Contact Us

Home > Error Sending > Error Sending Response Not Enough Free Resources

Error Sending Response Not Enough Free Resources

decrease ? TIA, James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. If you wish to limit the amount of memory used > by the server, use the max-cache-size and recursive-clients options instead. > thanks > Robert > --- > Quantum Radio: World Is this a priority issue or something? have a peek at this web-site

Feb 2 00:26:50 nanguo /usr/local/sbin/named[74]: client 24.6.253.3#1600: error sending response: not enough free resources thanks Robert 2. named[69750]: client *ip removed*: error sending response: not enough free resources named[69750]: client *ip removed*: error sending response: not enough free resources named[69750]: client *ip removed*: error sending response: not enough WAS Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" In reply to this post by James Smallacombe-2 Hi-- On Jan 29, 2010, at 8:51 AM, James Smallacombe wrote: >> On cPanel Forums > Server Administration and Customization > Bind / DNS / Nameserver Issues > This site uses cookies. try this

Again, it is not clear to me which is the cause > and which is the effect. > > Last bit of info: I just did a: 'tcpdump -n | grep The server itself never went down during this time, but the Ethernet did. Bottom line: Would congestion cause this issue, or would this issue cause congestion? Error message: "Should Not Be Here" 13.

TIA! If so, how? Try : limit datasize unlimited before starting named and see if named can grow above the size it has now. Last bit of info: I just did a: 'tcpdump -n | grep -i udp' and saw a bunch of these, coming up a couple of times per second: 11:31:59.387561 IP (IP

Either RedHat doesn't have this, or it's called something else entirely. Again, it is not clear to me which is the cause and which is the effect. Other messages on this subject suggest a shortage of mbuffs of an issue with the nic driver (the item I read was complaining about fxp, but I have em) so here https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2002-March/037347.html Load averages around 0.5, cpu averages about 90% idle, not swapping much.

The server itself never went down during this time, but the Ethernet did. I ask because I've >> maxed out pipes before, but never seen it shut all traffic down this much. >> One key difference that I forgot to mention is that this Do some NIC cards seem to have less problems. data (339128 bytes duped) 334018 out-of-order packets (337877573 bytes) 85687 packets (637782 bytes) of data after window 10 window probes 114047 window update packets 160975 packets

The server itself never > went down during this time, but the Ethernet did. I'm definitely keeping my fingers crossed that it does. -- Take care, Randall > Hi guys. It indicates a problem sending UDP traffic; netstat -s output would be informative. As I had to catch a flight, I just rebooted it and it was fine. > > After getting home, I looked in the syslog and see thousands of these: >

Join Date Feb 2005 Posts 2 named problems - "not enough free resources" Hi there, On the server that I maintain, I sometimes notice long waiting times to connect to a Check This Out Only the messages from named. -- Regards, Terrence Koeman MediaMonks B.V. (www.mediamonks.com) Please quote all replies in correspondence. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] > If your named serves also as primary od secondary DNS for a domain, you can replace allow-query with:allow-recursion { local_lan; };allow-query-cache { local_lan; };This will decrease the load of the server That is standard Windows NetBIOS over IP traffic.

If so then the default limits should be changed. ( if you run named as user named, go for an entry for "named" in /etc/login.conf ) /etc/login.conf seems to be a Not a member yet? Aminux: 2013-01-31 в 21:01:00 At my case server working on FreeBSD, with ipfw-firewall. http://vgadownload.com/error-sending/error-sending-mail-smtp-server-response-550-5-7-1.html Besides that, there are no other problems with the network.

Stay logged in Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Toggle navigation Products Plans & Pricing Partners Support Resources Preview Forums Forums Quick Links Search Forums New Posts Search titles Therefore, this > option is rarely useful as a way of limiting the amount of memory used by > the server, but it can be used to raise an operating system It seems to really effect certain networks > (for instance, MSN often has trouble 'finding' websites hosted on my > server, while other users can get to their files all the

Have you tried turning up the logging to verbosity to get a better idea of what's happening? -- Adam Vande More _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questionsTo unsubscribe, send any mail

They switched it to 100Mbs and only time will tell if that fixes it. Sorry about not beeing able to solve your problem, but this is a road to follow. I've increased the maximum number of sockets available, as well > as the maximum number of open files, and so far nothing. Results 1 to 2 of 2 Thread: named problems - "not enough free resources" Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page… Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to

Appreciate any and all clues, especially if you are familiar with this. A datasize limit of 524288 would stop a nameserver after a while. It shouldn't be coming over your link unless your machines are sharing a subnet with someone else's Windows (or Samba) domain. have a peek here I also have 2 gigs set aside for swap space, and the server hardly ever uses the swap space, so I doubt it is seriously running out of resources.

Landscape and Irrigation Design in R12 & R13 9. "Not enough memory" browse error w/ NetBEUI and WfWg 10. I > did a little > > > > > searching and found a post somewhere that it'd indicate a > > > shortage of > > > > > mbufs. No, create an account now. Today's security run output showed this: +(RULE NUMBER) 16054161 131965203420 deny ip from any to (blocked IP) and more alarmingly, this: kernel log messages: +++ /tmp/security.BErFHSS3 2010-01-29 03:09:32.000000000 -0500

Similar Threads - (DNS) Bind Problem BIND Disabled & Port 53 blocked ItsMattSon, Sep 5, 2016, in forum: Bind / DNS / Nameserver Issues Replies: 6 Views: 165 cPanelMichael Sep 19, I purged it, but it still required a reboot as CPU was through the roof. They switched it to >> 100Mbs and only time will tell if that fixes it. >> >> Does this sound like it could be the entire cause? They switched it to > 100Mbs and only time will tell if that fixes it. > > Does this sound like it could be the entire cause?

Home Forum Today's Posts | FAQ | Calendar | Community Groups | Forum Actions Mark Forums Read | Quick Links View Site Leaders | Unanswered Posts | Forum Rules Articles Marketplace I am running Bind 9.2.1 on this box, and the syslog file gets filled with messages from servers trying to update their DNS info, and mine is saying that there isn't I saw a ton of UDP traffic outbound to one IP that turned out to be a colocated server in Chicago. I saw a ton of UDP > traffic outbound to one IP that turned out to be a colocated server in > Chicago.

net> Date: 2003-04-25 19:50:19 [Download message RAW] The cards are on fixed 100BaseTX full duplex already... Newer Than: Search this thread only Search this forum only Display results as threads More... CEO and Janitor [hidden email] http://3.am========================================================================= _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questionsTo unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" Charles Swiger Reply | Threaded Open this post in threaded view You might find that setting options in named.conf to tune the # of outstanding queries will help: clients-per-query 10; max-clients-per-query 20; Doing a tcpdump and examining the queries to see what

I instead edited /etc/sysctl.conf, and adjusted the values in there. I emailed the provider and they told me that they had my port on their Ether switch set to 10Mbs. This error starts in the error log as soon as I boot the server (before it's even showing any memory consumption). eureka# uname -a FreeBSD eureka 6.3-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p1 #1: Mon Feb 25 08:17:08 PST 2008 cstdenis at eureka:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EUREKA i386 eureka# named -v BIND 9.3.4-P1 eureka# ifconfig em1 em1: flags=8843 mtu 1500

Is my server being used to DDOS others? Top 1. WAS Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:59 PM, James Smallacombe <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> To follow up on this: