Contact UsHome > Error There > Error There Is No Specific Subroutine For The Generic
Error There Is No Specific Subroutine For The Generic
Then, one must pick the datatype depending on the combination of library, compile options, etc. What are Imperial officers wearing here? How do I explain that this is a terrible idea? AttachmentSize Download a8.rar16.71 KB RSS Top 7 posts / 0 new Last post For more complete information about compiler optimizations, see our Optimization Notice.
In your case generic2.f90:81.24: call d_vode(istate, lambda_fcn, dummy_jac, lambda, x_tmp, x_end, tol, pm) 1 Error: Interface mismatch in dummy procedure 'f' at (1): Shape mismatch in dimension 1 of argument 'y' cat test.f90 SUBROUTINE mp_waitall_2(requests) USE mpi INTEGER, DIMENSION(:, :), INTENT(inout) :: requests INTEGER :: ierr INTEGER :: count count = SIZE(requests) CALL mpi_waitall(count, requests, MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE, ierr) END SUBROUTINE mp_waitall_2 mpif90 test.f90 Results 1 to 3 of 3 Thread: error #6285: There is no matching specific subroutine for this generic subroutine cal Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page… Search Thread Reply With Quote Quick Navigation Fortran Library Top Site Areas Settings Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Forums Rogue Wave Corporate Announcements General Discussions Products HostAccess HostAccess Discussions http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17304246/fortran-4-7-2-4-8-1-error-there-is-no-specific-subroutine-for-the-generic-vode
Attachments: AttachmentSize Download b1.rar2.8 KB Top Steve Lionel (Intel) Fri, 01/06/2012 - 06:58 In pr2.f90, remove the procedure declarations of func1 and dfunc1. Comment 2 Tobias Burnus 2009-06-15 22:40:33 UTC Also for OPTIONAL a suitable error message would be useful. Browse other questions tagged fortran gfortran or ask your own question. Browse other questions tagged compiler-errors fortran fortran90 gfortran fortran-iso-c-binding or ask your own question.
Here's a version with INTERFACE: module if3 interface dfpmin subroutine dfpmin(p,func,dfunc) real(kind(1d0)), dimension(4), intent(inout) :: p interface function func (p) real,dimension(4),intent(in) :: p real(kind(1d0)) func end function func end interface interface I wanted to use the function Lin_sol_self and I have the following error. I hope this helps. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24287436/how-to-have-generic-subroutine-to-work-in-fortran-with-assumed-size-array int *onembed, int ostride, int odist, !
Otherwise one can search for ages for the problem. There's no need for pointers for what (I think) you are trying to achieve... –Alexander Vogt Jun 18 '14 at 16:54 Yes I know. I tried to follow the examples on the tutorial page of the hdf5 group, but i got the following error by compiling the fortran module: " call h5dwrite_f(dat_id, H5T_NATIVE_DOUBLE,m,dim_ension, error) 1 The mpif.h interfaces are not cross-checked by the compiler at compile-time; the "use mpi" and "use mpi_f08" interfaces are checked by the compiler at compile-time. … On May 16, 2015, at
The data I'm trying to read with f90 is 64-bit integer array. This is not allowed. (Oh, and you have also misdeclared the arguments to DFPMIN in dkd.) I tried to unravel all of this. Try building the HDF5 library with FCFLAGS =-fdefault-real-8. It is technically different than MPI_STATUS_IGNORE (note that it is singular).
The problem is the native double in HDF5 does not match the native double in your program because you promoted real to double precision in your program but not in the In the code you provided earlier, you had a DFPMIN routine with six. Is intelligence the "natural" product of evolution? Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time.
more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Looking at the standard, yes, it seems to be the case. Bug20067 - gfortran: misleading error message resolving generic subroutine Summary: gfortran: misleading error message resolving generic subroutine Status: RESOLVED FIXED Alias: None Product: gcc Classification: Unclassified Component: fortran (show other bugs) Also, are sure that you can interchange int and size_t?
Then change the references in the call to dfpmin to func and dfunc instead of func1 and dfunc1. PR fortran/20067 * gfortran.dg/generic_5.f90: Change error message. That way you should never have an interface that does not have a matching valid KIND associated with it.
Ensure that symbol reference is refreshed, in case the search produces a NULL. (resolve_specific_s): Restructure search, as above and as resolve_specific_f.
share|improve this answer answered Nov 8 '11 at 7:01 M. align the '=' in separate equations always at the center of the page How to deal with players rejecting the question premise What is the best way to upgrade gear in With all the recursion, having a proper error message is not trivial. Right? (again, I'm not a Fortran expert...
Which version of gcc and what system/OS are you using? PR fortran/24866 * gfortran.dg/module_proc_external_dummy.f90: New test. This is important for robustness if you are going to be changing the size of REALs with compiler flags. Try upgrading to the latest v1.10.x version. … -- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ vondele commented May 24, 2016 The issue is still present in v1.10.2
For 1d transforms in C one would usually just pass reference to variable instead of creating an array. –Jakub Narębski Nov 8 '11 at 9:36 @Jakub: If you declare By default in f90 integer is 4-byte. edit: with ifort, it says: $ ifort overload.f90 overload.f90(37): error #6285: There is no matching specific subroutine for this generic subroutine call. [SUB] call sub(ai(2),3) -------^ compilation aborted for overload.f90 (code I am worried that size_t might be 64 bit and int 32 bit in gcc on your system.